Differences between centralized and decentralized digital networks
- What is meant by Centralized networks
- Working of centralized networks
- What are decentralized networks, and how are they different from traditional networks?
- Working of Decentralized networks
- What separates centralized from decentralized networks?
- Advantages of centralized and decentralized networks
- Drawbacks of centralized and decentralized networks
What is meant by Centralized networks
There is a single point of authority in charge of managing all the components of a digital network.
An individual, a group of people, or even a company can be the authority. In most cases, the central authority is in charge of network upkeep, user management, and the formulation of rules and regulations.
Centralized networks are structured around a single server that handles all of the network’s critical functions. When a server goes down, the entire network goes down as well. Centralization is common among the digital sites we use on a regular basis, such Facebook and YouTube. For the purposes of these examples, assume that the corporation is in charge of managing the network’s data and operations.
Read also: What Is Metaverse?
Working of centralized networks
Data processing and network administration are handled by a centralized server in a centralized network.
Data and processes on the network are stored and run on this server. A single place may house it, or it may be spread out over a number of locations.
The central server is used to connect the network’s lower-powered workstations. Workstations instead of directly performing certain functions (data storage, programs, utilities) submit their requests to the main server.
Central servers often have a large amount of processing power and storage space built in. It includes a high-speed internet connection as well. Large numbers of users and plenty of data can be handled by these.
Check also: What are dApps?
What are decentralized networks, and how are they different from traditional networks?
A decentralized digital network does not have a single point of control.
An alternative is a system where users share power. No single server or command center exists. To the contrary, the network is administered by a system in which all users have the same amount of power and authority.
The internet is an excellent example of a decentralized network because it is not controlled by a single authority. Instead, it is shared by all of its users. Some, on the other hand, believe that the internet is becoming more centralized as a result of the monopoly of huge names like Google, Facebook, and WordPress.
What’s the reason for this? The servers of the major players house the bulk of the world’s data. As a result, one must use one of them to get to anything online. “Is the internet centralized or decentralized?” is the question.
But the notion that it is gradually becoming more centralized cannot be emphasized or ignored.
Bitcoin (BTC), the first cryptocurrency, is another example. After the Great Financial Crisis of 2007–2008, Bitcoin’s network architecture was born. In a nutshell, central institutions (banks, financial enterprises) “had failed the people” when they released Bitcoin as a decentralized network.
Bitcoin’s creators realized that the whole financial system is vulnerable to a single point of failure or control. This is why Bitcoin was built to be decentralized and widely distributed instead. A single group or individual has no control over it. Instead, its users are responsible for managing it.
Read also: What Web 3.0 is?
Working of Decentralized networks
It is more efficient to use several devices rather than rely on a single central server when setting up a decentralized network.
Users can still access data in a decentralized network even if one of the master nodes goes down or is attacked. As a result, the network as a whole will be unaffected.
New technology has given computers and other devices a boost in processing power, making it possible to connect them and use them for distributed computing. As a result of this, distributed networks are made possible.
While decentralized networks are unique from centralized networks, they are still dependent on main servers, even if there are more than one per network, and this needs to be remembered at all times.
Check also: The best Crypto Signals
What separates centralized from decentralized networks?
When it comes down to it, centralized and decentralized networks are fundamentally different because of what they stand for.
Maintaining control and stability is achieved by using an integrated network. In contrast, a decentralized network is geared on user freedom and collaboration.
Meanwhile, let’s have a look at the fundamental differences:
- Centralized networks necessitate the use of a third-party intermediary to facilitate communication between the various nodes. A decentralized network eliminates the requirement for a third party. Every node on the network has direct access to every other node.
- Because all data and information are housed in a single area, centralized networks are less transparent. However, distributed ledger technology, a benefit of decentralization, makes transactions more transparent (DLT).
- Because hackers only need to target one central location to get access to the entire system, centralized networks are more susceptible to attacks. Because just one node is vulnerable, decentralized networks are more secure.
- Adding more servers to a centralized network makes it easier to scale the system. Decentralized networks have a harder time accomplishing this since each node must be able to handle additional traffic.
- Because there are more middlemen engaged in centralized networks (such banks and financial services), exchange fees tend to be higher. In decentralized networks, such actors do not exist, which results in lower fees.
Advantages of centralized and decentralized networks
It’s easier to delegate tasks in a centralized network because there’s a clear chain of command and it’s less expensive to set up than in a decentralized network. Unlike centralized networks, decentralized networks can’t be changed or censored.
Those in charge are well-defined in a centralized network due to the presence of a well-defined chain of command. This can be useful in times of crisis when rapid and efficient decisions are required.
This makes centralized networks cheaper to set up and operate because only one server or mainframe is required. Clear lines of power also make it simpler to delegate work. Tasks are accomplished in a timely and effective manner as a result.
There is no central authority controlling the data and information in decentralized networks. Additionally, once data is entered into the system, it cannot be edited or amended in any way, shape, or form. That way, you can be assured that your data is safe and that you’re not falling victim to any scams.
Cryptography is another benefit of decentralized networks, which ensures the security of data ledgers. Cryptographic validation of data requires relying on information from the preceding block, which provides a high level of security.
Finally, there is no central authority to control or restrict content in a decentralized network. Information can be exchanged without fear of retaliation.
Read also: The best Decentralized Exchanges
Drawbacks of centralized and decentralized networks
There are some negatives to centralized networks, such as censorship, restricted scalability, and security concerns. Decentralized networks, on the other hand, suffer from a lack of clarity, high setup and maintenance costs, and unpredictability.
A single point of failure is all too common in centralized systems. Especially in systems where security is a priority, if the central authority is compromised, everything in the system comes crashing down.
Generally, the central authority can only allow for as much growth as the system can handle. Constraints on innovation might be discouraging for customers who demand more features and functionality.
Additionally, censorship has its downsides. In a centralized system, the central authority has the ability to censor content. People who want to openly exchange knowledge should avoid this at all costs.
A lack of clarity in a decentralized system can be a problem. In times of crisis, a decentralized network governance structure could be its undoing because it does not rely on important authorities to make rapid judgments.
It is more expensive to set up and maintain a decentralized system since it necessitates systems with automatic communication capabilities.
Decentralized digital currency prices are also notoriously unpredictable, making them a dangerous venture for investors who like stability.
Check also: Ethereum Gas Price Monitor